top of page

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 Co-Op Campaign — Why the Hate Misses the Point

  • Writer: XmisterfruitsX
    XmisterfruitsX
  • 2 days ago
  • 3 min read
Operator Mike Harper screenshot from Black Ops 7 in Battle during a boss fight.

The co-op campaign in Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 has quietly become one of the most criticized parts of the game.


Too short.

Too chaotic.

Too unfocused.

“Not a real campaign.”


That’s the narrative.


But like a lot of Call of Duty discourse, most of the criticism says more about what players expected than what the mode actually delivers.


This isn’t an argument that the Black Ops 7 co-op campaign is flawless. It isn’t.

But the idea that it’s pointless, lazy, or a failure completely misses what it’s trying to be—and why it actually works for the right audience.


A scene of floating boulders from Black Ops 7

1. The Expectations Problem (Again)


Every time Call of Duty releases a campaign, it gets measured against two things:

1. The most cinematic moments in franchise history

2. Whatever version of “classic CoD” exists in the player’s memory


The Black Ops 7 co-op campaign was never meant to compete with a tightly scripted, solo, set-piece-heavy experience. It was designed around shared play, replayability, and moment-to-moment decision-making with another person.


But a lot of criticism treats co-op design as a downgrade instead of a different design philosophy.


You can’t judge a cooperative campaign by solo pacing standards. That’s like criticizing a co-op board game for not playing well alone.


The disappointment didn’t come from bad design.

It came from misaligned expectations.


A screenshot of a keypad from a codebreaking scene in Black Ops 7.

2. “It’s Messy” vs. Designed for Co-Op Chaos


One of the most common complaints is that the co-op campaign feels chaotic and unfocused.


That’s… kind of the point.


Co-op campaigns live in the space between control and unpredictability. They’re built to allow:

• Player improvisation

• Mistakes

• Recovery

• Different playstyles clashing in real time



You’re not meant to experience every moment the same way twice. One player rushing while the other plays methodically changes the flow completely—and the campaign is flexible enough to support that.


Critics often frame this as “lack of polish,” but it’s more accurate to call it intentional looseness. The game prioritizes shared experience over perfect choreography.


That’s a design choice, not a failure.


Shattered glass before an image of operator Mason from Black Ops 7

3. The Co-Op Campaign Does Something the Solo One Can’t


Here’s what gets ignored in most reviews: the social layer.


Playing the Black Ops 7 co-op campaign with another person fundamentally changes the tone. It becomes:

• Less about spectacle

• More about communication

• More reactive

• More memorable


The tension of covering each other, improvising under pressure, and adapting to mistakes creates moments no scripted solo campaign can replicate.


Is it always cinematic? No.

Is it more personal? Absolutely.


A lot of the hate comes from players treating co-op as a secondary mode rather than its own experience with different strengths.


Black ops 7 operators gliding through a metropolis.

4. “It’s Too Short” Is a Lazy Critique


Yes, the co-op campaign is shorter than traditional solo campaigns.


That’s true.


What gets left out is why.


Co-op campaigns are built for:

• Replayability

• Different role assignments

• Difficulty scaling

• Experimentation


Length isn’t the goal—engagement density is.


A shorter campaign that encourages replay and experimentation often respects your time more than a bloated one-and-done experience. Especially in a franchise where most players won’t replay a solo campaign at all.


Calling it “too short” ignores how co-op content is actually consumed.


A giant plant-like creature attacking a first-person shooter in the nightmare stage of Black Ops 7.

5. Who the Black Ops 7 Co-Op Campaign Is Actually For


This mode is not for:

• Players who want a fully scripted, cinematic solo story

• Those who prefer passive storytelling

• Anyone expecting linear set pieces every mission


But it is for:

• Friends who want a shared narrative experience

• Players who enjoy adapting on the fly

• Fans who value replayability over spectacle

• Groups who treat campaigns as something to play, not just watch


If you approach it as “lesser campaign content,” it disappoints.


If you approach it as a cooperative experience built around shared chaos, it delivers exactly what it promises.


Operators Mike Harper, David Mason, and Leilani Tupuola in a dark scene from Black Ops 7

Final Thoughts: Not Worse—Just Different


The Black Ops 7 co-op campaign isn’t a replacement for classic Call of Duty campaigns.


It’s an alternative.


And like most alternatives, it got punished for not being what people expected instead of being evaluated for what it actually is.


It’s rough in places.

It’s messy by design.

It’s shorter than some want.


But it also:

• Encourages genuine cooperation

• Creates unscripted moments

• Respects replayability

• Offers something solo campaigns simply can’t


You don’t have to love it.


But dismissing it as lazy or pointless ignores the fact that it succeeds at exactly what it set out to do.


And that’s the difference between criticism and reflex.

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page